Is chemical test evidence required to prove you were driving while impaired or intoxicated?
|
Yes, and a BAC test is also required.
|
|
|
No. The testimony of a police officer about the way you drive, your behavior when arrested is enough.
|
|
|
Yes.
|
|
|
No, but a breath or blood test is required.
|
Explanation
Chemical test evidence is not necessary to prove that you were intoxicated or impaired while driving. The testimony of a police officer regarding your driving behavior, as well as your demeanor and appearance at the time of arrest, can be sufficient to convict you, even in the absence of a chemical test.
Answer Statistics
🟠 This question is challenging — 30.1% of our users get this question wrong.
Other questions in the same category: Alcohol and Drug Effects on Driving
Your driving ability can be affected by:What is the only effective way of reducing your blood alcohol content (BAC)?Any driver under 21 with a breath or blood alcohol level of __ or higher is required to attend a substance abuse course.The only effective way to remove alcohol from the body is:Which of these is true about drinking and driving?Which of the following contains enough alcohol to increase BAC by about .02 percent?If you drink alcohol socially, what helps ensure safe driving?Driving drunk with a conditional license is:At the time of arrest for DUI, you will be suspended if you have a breath or blood alcohol level of ___ or above.Penalties for driving under the influence of alcohol include:
This question appears in the following DMV practice tests: