Is chemical test evidence required to prove you were driving while impaired or intoxicated?
|
Yes.
|
|
|
No, but a breath or blood test is required.
|
|
|
Yes, and a BAC test is also required.
|
|
|
No. The testimony of a police officer about the way you drive, your behavior when arrested is enough.
|
Explanation
Chemical test evidence is not necessary to prove that you were intoxicated or impaired while driving. The testimony of a police officer regarding your driving behavior, as well as your demeanor and appearance at the time of arrest, can be sufficient to convict you, even in the absence of a chemical test.
Answer Statistics
🟠 This question is challenging — 30.2% of our users get this question wrong.
Other questions in the same category: Alcohol and Drug Effects on Driving
Which of the following statements is true about the effects of alcohol?The only effective way to reduce your blood alcohol content (BAC) is:If you are arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol and you refuse to take the blood test, you will receive a:Drinking coffee after drinking alcohol:The effect that alcohol has on your judgment:Your BAC depends on:Which of the following is a penalty for a First DUI Conviction:Alcohol first impairs your:One of the penalties for driving under the influence of alcohol in California is:Which of the following does not happen after drinking?
This question appears in the following DMV practice tests: