Is chemical test evidence required to prove you were driving while impaired or intoxicated?
|
Yes, and a BAC test is also required.
|
|
|
No, but a breath or blood test is required.
|
|
|
No. The testimony of a police officer about the way you drive, your behavior when arrested is enough.
|
|
|
Yes.
|
Explanation
Chemical test evidence is not necessary to prove that you were intoxicated or impaired while driving. The testimony of a police officer regarding your driving behavior, as well as your demeanor and appearance at the time of arrest, can be sufficient to convict you, even in the absence of a chemical test.
Answer Statistics
🟠 This question is challenging — 30.2% of our users get this question wrong.
Other questions in the same category: Alcohol and Drug Effects on Driving
A BAC of ___ percent or higher is legal evidence of intoxication.With a BAC of .10%, you are _______ times more likely to cause an accident than if you were sober.A second DUI conviction within 20 years results in a minimum:Only _____ can reduce the alcohol level in the blood.On average, the human body can dispose of the alcohol in 5 ounces of wine in:Alcohol is the single greatest factor in fatal motor vehicle accidents.You are considered to be driving under the influence when your blood alcohol concentration (BAC) is ____ or more.On average, the human body can dispose of the alcohol in 12 ounces of beer in about:Who is especially at risk when drinking alcohol or taking other drugs?A few drinks after work before driving home:
This question appears in the following DMV practice tests: