Is chemical test evidence required to prove you were driving while impaired or intoxicated?
|
Yes.
|
|
|
Yes, and a BAC test is also required.
|
|
|
No, but a breath or blood test is required.
|
|
|
No. The testimony of a police officer about the way you drive, your behavior when arrested is enough.
|
Explanation
Chemical test evidence is not necessary to prove that you were intoxicated or impaired while driving. The testimony of a police officer regarding your driving behavior, as well as your demeanor and appearance at the time of arrest, can be sufficient to convict you, even in the absence of a chemical test.
Answer Statistics
🟠 This question is challenging — 30.2% of our users get this question wrong.
Other questions in the same category: Alcohol and Drug Effects on Driving
A Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) of _____ is evidence of intoxication.BAC is expressed in:Taking drugs along with alcohol:If a person under 21 years old consumes alcohol, but is not driving a motor vehicle, the penalty for a first offense is _______ and a fine.If you want to go to a social event where you might drink alcohol, you should:To regain their license, drivers whose license has been revoked as a result of DUI must meet several requirements, including an evaluation for alcohol and drug problems and paying a reinstatement fee.You are convicted of Driving While Ability Impaired as a first offense. Which of the following potential consequences do you face?As the percentage of alcohol in your blood (BAC) increases, you become:In New Jersey, for individuals younger than 21 it is illegal to drive with a BAC of _______ percent or higher.A BAC of ___ percent or higher is legal evidence of intoxication.
This question appears in the following DMV practice tests: