Is chemical test evidence required to prove you were driving while impaired or intoxicated?
|
No. The testimony of a police officer about the way you drive, your behavior when arrested is enough.
|
|
|
Yes, and a BAC test is also required.
|
|
|
Yes.
|
|
|
No, but a breath or blood test is required.
|
Explanation
Chemical test evidence is not necessary to prove that you were intoxicated or impaired while driving. The testimony of a police officer regarding your driving behavior, as well as your demeanor and appearance at the time of arrest, can be sufficient to convict you, even in the absence of a chemical test.
Answer Statistics
🟠 This question is challenging — 30.3% of our users get this question wrong.
Other questions in the same category: Alcohol and Drug Effects on Driving
A second refusal to take a blood or breath test will result in:Which of the following is the only way to lower your BAC?Alcohol is:A second DUI conviction within 20 years results in a minimum:You are driving under the extreme influence if your blood alcohol concentration is:Driving under the influence of any medication which impairs your driving is permitted:Drinking alcohol while taking other drugs could cause:What effect does drinking alcohol and taking a prescription drug or over the counter medicine have?On what three factors does your blood alcohol content (BAC) depend?Which of these statements about drugs and traffic is true?
This question appears in the following DMV practice tests: