Is chemical test evidence required to prove you were driving while impaired or intoxicated?
|
No, but a breath or blood test is required.
|
|
|
Yes, and a BAC test is also required.
|
|
|
No. The testimony of a police officer about the way you drive, your behavior when arrested is enough.
|
|
|
Yes.
|
Explanation
Chemical test evidence is not necessary to prove that you were intoxicated or impaired while driving. The testimony of a police officer regarding your driving behavior, as well as your demeanor and appearance at the time of arrest, can be sufficient to convict you, even in the absence of a chemical test.
Answer Statistics
🟠 This question is challenging — 30.1% of our users get this question wrong.
Other questions in the same category: Alcohol and Drug Effects on Driving
Which of these statements is true about driving and taking medications:The only effective way to reduce your blood alcohol content (BAC) is:When in a motor vehicle on or off the highway, it is:Alcohol is:Alcohol affects:Drinking alcohol while taking drugs:It is illegal for any person to operate a vehicle with a BAC (blood alcohol concentration) of _____ or higher.In California, what BAC is evidence of intoxication?
Which of these statements is true about drugs and driving?To drink an alcoholic beverage in a motor vehicle on a public highway, street or road is:
This question appears in the following DMV practice tests: