Is chemical test evidence required to prove you were driving while impaired or intoxicated?
|
No. The testimony of a police officer about the way you drive, your behavior when arrested is enough.
|
|
|
Yes.
|
|
|
No, but a breath or blood test is required.
|
|
|
Yes, and a BAC test is also required.
|
Explanation
Chemical test evidence is not necessary to prove that you were intoxicated or impaired while driving. The testimony of a police officer regarding your driving behavior, as well as your demeanor and appearance at the time of arrest, can be sufficient to convict you, even in the absence of a chemical test.
Answer Statistics
🟠 This question is challenging — 30.1% of our users get this question wrong.
Other questions in the same category: Alcohol and Drug Effects on Driving
Alcohol reaches your brain within _____ after consumption.You can be charged with DUI if you are found to be driving:Drinking alcohol and driving is:A 12-ounce bottle of wine cooler has about the same amount of alcohol as:DWI stands for:Higher fines and increased license penalties may result from a third or subsequent alcohol-related conviction within:As the percentage of alcohol in your blood (BAC) increases, you become:After drinking, which of the following can help you sober up?Which of the following factors affect the absorption of alcohol?A blood alcohol concentration of 0.02 percent:
This question appears in the following DMV practice tests: