Is chemical test evidence required to prove you were driving while impaired or intoxicated?
|
Yes, and a BAC test is also required.
|
|
|
No, but a breath or blood test is required.
|
|
|
No. The testimony of a police officer about the way you drive, your behavior when arrested is enough.
|
|
|
Yes.
|
Explanation
Chemical test evidence is not necessary to prove that you were intoxicated or impaired while driving. The testimony of a police officer regarding your driving behavior, as well as your demeanor and appearance at the time of arrest, can be sufficient to convict you, even in the absence of a chemical test.
Answer Statistics
🟠 This question is challenging — 30.4% of our users get this question wrong.
Other questions in the same category: Alcohol and Drug Effects on Driving
What kinds of drugs other than alcohol can affect your driving skills?
Under New York State’s “Zero Tolerance” law, it is a violation for a person under 21 to drive with:Alcohol:A BAC of more than ___ percent is legal evidence that you are impaired.A second refusal to take a blood or breath test will result in:Which of the following statements is true about the effects of alcohol?Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) depends on each of the following, except:What is the only effective method to reduce your BAC?The minimum drinking age in this State is ____ years.Drivers who refuse to submit to a chemical test for alcohol or drugs will have their license suspended for:
This question appears in the following DMV practice tests: