Is chemical test evidence required to prove you were driving while impaired or intoxicated?
|
No. The testimony of a police officer about the way you drive, your behavior when arrested is enough.
|
|
|
No, but a breath or blood test is required.
|
|
|
Yes, and a BAC test is also required.
|
|
|
Yes.
|
Explanation
Chemical test evidence is not necessary to prove that you were intoxicated or impaired while driving. The testimony of a police officer regarding your driving behavior, as well as your demeanor and appearance at the time of arrest, can be sufficient to convict you, even in the absence of a chemical test.
Answer Statistics
🟠 This question is challenging — 30.1% of our users get this question wrong.
Other questions in the same category: Alcohol and Drug Effects on Driving
Parental consent to conduct breath, blood, and urine tests is:Drivers under 21 years of age are considered to be driving under the influence if their blood alcohol concentration (BAC) is:If you've had a few beers, the effects of alcohol will be reduced only by:It is against the law for anyone under the age of 21 to:In New York State, you can be arrested for driving with a blood alcohol content (BAC) of ___ percent or more.The Implied Consent Law means that:What is a likely effect when you take another drug while you drink alcohol?__________ limit(s) your concentration, perception, judgment, and memory.If you refuse to take a blood test when asked by an officer, your license will automatically be suspended for:You go with a group of friends to a social event, and you plan to have a few drinks. You should:
This question appears in the following DMV practice tests: