Is chemical test evidence required to prove you were driving while impaired or intoxicated?
|
No. The testimony of a police officer about the way you drive, your behavior when arrested is enough.
|
|
|
No, but a breath or blood test is required.
|
|
|
Yes.
|
|
|
Yes, and a BAC test is also required.
|
Explanation
Chemical test evidence is not necessary to prove that you were intoxicated or impaired while driving. The testimony of a police officer regarding your driving behavior, as well as your demeanor and appearance at the time of arrest, can be sufficient to convict you, even in the absence of a chemical test.
Answer Statistics
🟠 This question is challenging — 30.2% of our users get this question wrong.
Other questions in the same category: Alcohol and Drug Effects on Driving
Controlled substances include:Only _____ can reduce the alcohol level in the blood.It is illegal for anyone to drink alcoholic beverages in a vehicle.You can be charged with DUI if you are found to be driving:_______ can drink alcohol and drive safely.If you are arrested for driving with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) above the legal limit:If you are arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol:Drinking alcohol will affect you:Drinking coffee after drinking alcohol:You go with a group of friends to a social event, and you plan to have a few drinks. You should:
This question appears in the following DMV practice tests: